Pnas Pending Recommendation After Editorial Board Review

I just submitted my first, first-author paper to PNAS this week and was wondering what it means for the review status to change from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation. Executive summary. There were many advances in areas of basic cardiac electrophysiology ranging from application of genetic tools to better understanding electrophysiological disease to identifying potentially targetable molecular and protein mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis to characterizing the noncardiac milieu that drives evolution of substrate in a variety of different. Manuscript submission under review. After manuscript submission, authors of papers under consideration for publication will be sent a link to the Authorship Form to complete and submit. The IPCC is understood to be a meta-review of the available literature on climate change, but allowing authors to review their own work represents something of a departure from the scientific process. The NIH dual peer review system is mandated by statute in accordance with section 492 of the Public Health Service Act and federal regulations. When the required number of reviews have been received, the comments and manuscript are forwarded for an editorial review. Banking Standards Board was a response to. The application of the Eq. Almost seven years after the death of John Pat, and after a number of court proceedings involving the events of the night of 28 September 1983, the Royal Commission came to Roebourne. One of them gave very general comments and didn`t seem to be critical about the work. Das has co-authored over 35 peer-reviewed publications and several patent disclosures, given dozens of invited talks at several university colloquiums, department seminars, top rated conferences, and workshops. This is a volunteer position, but we hope to reward you with $25-$100 as a token of appreciation for your services (pending on available funds and OSU approval). It is said that if PNAS decides not to submit for review, the draft is very fast, and the results will be known in about two weeks. After years of slowly tightening its editorial policy, papers contributed by National Academy of Science (NAS) members appear to be performing more like other submissions. [Editorial Remark: One gets the feeling that whenever science and technology dislocate the "normal" pattern of human affairs, there is an inevitable backlash until the public gets familiar with it. So, as an author you should expect that your submitted papers, if they make it past the first peer review cycle, will require some sort of modification to satisfy the critiques of the reviewers. The life expectancy of a hypothetical 50-year-old American woman today is 81. Those things often take time. This comprehensive handbook provides an authoritative source of information on global water and health, suitable for interdisciplinary teaching for advanced undergraduate and postgraduate students. What you have to understand though, it that on the recommendation of the Elliott and Gaffen study (1991), Paltridge’s study only covers the reanalysis data from 1973 to 2007 and limits its examination to particular latitudes between 50° S and 50° N, and atmospheric pressures up to up to 500 hPa everywhere, together with the summer season. It is the second largest family in the CFR flora after Asteraceae. PNASでは文字と図とトータルで6ページに収まらないといけません。) 無事投稿できたら、受け取ったよというメールが著者全員に送られてきます。 そこから Check statusが Under Editorial Board Reviewになり一週間ぐらい経つとUnder Editor Reviewになります。. It continues to have a burden of morbidity and mortality that spans both the consequences of a sometimes progressive biliary injury, alongside a symptom profile notably encompassing pruritus, sicca complex, fatigue, abdominal discomfort and arthralgias/bone pain. every chance they get just to terrorize the public. The intended duration/review date for the antibiotics was stated; The prescribed antibiotics were chosen in accordance with Swansea Bay University Heath Board guidelines (or if non-adherence to guidelines was detected, whether non-adherence had been clinically justified). BioCore Group publishes top quality latest scientific research articles/journals in the field of science, Technology and Medicine. Our mission is to provide legal commentary, analysis, and rational criticism with a special emphasis on laws enacted or pending in the state of California. The Board may reject manuscripts without further review or may subject manuscripts to review and. Strategies to reduce transportation emissions in India : identifying air quality and climate co-benefits for the developing world Creator Reynolds, Conor Charles OBrien. Now it went back to 'under review. of Georgia Virginia Armbrust, Univ. The editorial board of this new journal should be able to draw in a steady stream of good article submissions. Material which has been previously copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in Public Science Framework. I'd also put a comma after "miniatures", and another after "New York" at the end of the first paragraph. Journal editorial staff and peer reviewers would use such data for the sole purpose of further evaluation. All species names in this publication were checked for their present taxonomic status (van Soest et al. We receive more than 16,000 submissions each year and currently accept less than 20%. Reviewing a Journal Article (Peer Review) Peer-review is defined as the expert assessment of submitted materials. What does PNAS's "Pending Final Recommendation" when submitting a paper mean? We recently submitted a paper to PNAS and now it is in the "Pending Final Recommendation" state. The normal procedure is to submit papers via Track II. The authors' uncorrected proof in PDF format then was provided under embargo to reporters, with anticipated online publication during the week of May 30. of Washington. After careful consideration, the editor decided that we cannot accept your manuscript. By Cara Kennedy-Cuomo, SDG Applied Research Associate, 17 Asset Management and Grace Stone, WIIP Investment Associate and MBA ‘20 As impact investors, asset managers, and high net worth individuals look to turn Impact Investing mainstream, the question of which frameworks to use to define this impact is an exciting but daunting one. Changes in regulatory review policies during the development period of any of our traits, changes in, or the enactment of, additional regulations or statutes, or changes in regulatory review. The core values of peer review drive the NIH to seek the highest level of ethical standards, and form the foundation for the laws, regulations, and policies that govern the NIH peer review process. The elk was imported into Korea from Canada on March 9, 1997. If you plan on presenting your embargoed paper at a conference prior to publication, please contact the PNAS News Office immediately at 202-334-1310 or [email protected] Because this disease predominantly affects MNs, we aimed to characterize the distinct expression profile. We have before us a 19 resolution, 96-54, that we've had for a few minutes. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. It also does not disclose whether it has a detailed CEO succession planning process, or a formal director education program. March 1, 2012 — The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced that it is revising the labels of certain statins as well as protease inhibitors for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) to warn about interactions between the 2 sets of drugs that could increase the risk for myopathy and kidney failure. Thus requests for minor changes to text are likely to be disregarded. does that mean it passed the editorial board and i will get the style requirements email from assistants and then it will go to peer review. The authors' uncorrected proof in PDF format then was provided under embargo to reporters, with anticipated online publication during the week of May 30. There was also a time in America when we didn't sanitize our children's play experience with political correctness. However, given the small founding. 995% (rank #809 on our directory) with total 58923 succesulf and 3 failed checks, monitored since 2006-11-02. Under Review. The elk was imported into Korea from Canada on March 9, 1997. Interventional Cardiology Review is supported by various levels of expertise: • Overall direction from an Editor-in-Chief, supported by Section Editors and an Editorial Board comprising leading. com avarage uptime is 99. While we retain strong ties with the NAS, whose members oversee the journal's rigorous 3-tier peer review process, we now receive more than 16,000 Direct Submissions each year. Cozzarelli began creating a board that was more diverse and more active. 18 All right. "Nick was fond of experiments and considered the Editorial Board a great experiment," says PNAS Managing Editor Daniel Salsbury. By the time a research study reaches the peer review process, many crucial decisions that affect the rigor of the study design, methodology, data collection, analysis and reporting have already been made. This guest blog comes from Sowmya Swaminathan, Head of Editorial Policy and Research Integrity for Nature Research. We owe a big thanks to Dr. 第一次投稿PNAS,经过半个多月的Under review,昨天变成了pending recommendation,这代表什么意思呢? 在小木虫看到好多under review之后是pending FINAL recommendation,我的没有final,这样多久能收到审稿意见呢?. The consequences of the controversy are pending (be it FTC or court proceedings) but it did prompt an "Editorial Expression of Concern" from its publisher, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, as well as an blog posting from OkCupid that "We experiment on human beings!" In September 2014, law professor James Grimmelmann argued. He is currently an editorial board member of the Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions. NEW ORLEANS – The Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board is recommending that New Orleans City Councilman James Gray’s law license be suspended for two years. My Tweet Stream 2008 > Present eBook or have listened to audiobook pls post a review @Amazon Getting my #bluemind on @SaveOurShores board meeting tonight. Peer-reviewed and invited presentations at regional, national, or international meetings. The final model would be even much complex (see for instance, H-W and K review Nature 2007 vol 450: p 964-972 ) Any tissue under a condition of ischemia that is required for some medical procedures (open heart surgery, organ transplants, etc) displays this fast regulatory mechanism (See Footnote 1, 2). Direct Submissions account for more than 75% of the research we publish. Collected here are the news articles, opinion pieces, and blog posts that are either written by or feature our members. The development was stopped after a phase II randomised multicentre study where the molecule failed to show a major clinical effect. Applying Classification of Recommendations and Level of Evidence A recommendation with Level of Evidence B or C does not imply that the recommendation is weak. Review Complete; E-Mail Notification Sent 2009-09-29 Pending Final Recommendation 2009-09-28 Under Editorial Board Review 2009-09-23. My new position offers the exciting opportunity to push much needed reforms in scientific publishing, and moreover, to do so from within the machinery of a peer-reviewed journal. will be reviewed by an Editorial Board member. 第一次投稿PNAS,经过半个多月的Under review,昨天变成了pending recommendation,这代表什么意思呢? 在小木虫看到好多under review之后是pending FINAL recommendation,我的没有final,这样多久能收到审稿意见呢?. Pending Final Recommendation 2016-01-15 Under Review 2016-01-07 Under Editor Review 2016-01-07 Under Editorial Board Review 2016-01-07 Author Approved Submission 2016-01-07 三周不到出结果还算很快的。 我看论坛很多人说投稿pnas必须认识院士这个其实是过去的故事,去他的网站看看就知道:. The move came after strong shareholder backing for an independent review at the Sports Direct AGM, with the company also saying a worker representative would be elected to the board by all staff “directly engaged or employed by Sports Direct”. CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATION. She also serves as a member of the Editorial boards of several academic journals including Current Pharmaceutical Design, Medicinal Chemistry, Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, The Open Cancer Journal, Biomedical Review and Adipobiology, Current Clinical pharmacology. just to be clear, the online tracker tool does indeed show when it has passed from the editorial board to the responsible editor? and then a separate update for going out for review?. Under Review. No individual may participate in the review of a paper for which they are an author. After logging into the system and clicking on a "Draft Recommendation" manuscript link preceded by a red arrow, you are presented with a Manuscript Items/Tasks screen as described above. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY December 18, 2013 Fred Poston, Dean Agriculture & Natural Resources Morrill Hall of Agriculture 446 W. 2 NAS Member EditorIf the Editorial Board member decides the paper should proceed further, it is assigned to an NAS Member Editor, a professional scientist and active researcher, who oversees the review process and determines suitability of the work for PNAS. Get the best broadband connection plans for the home. I say we get this thing sent to PNAS and see what happens. It’s offering to publish everything it deems to be of sufficient interest, and then letting authors choose to answer or not answer points that are raised in peer review after acceptance of the. Editor Board Member 是本领域的美国科学院院士,大牛。据我的有限了解,投到PNAS的文章修改后一般都会送二审吧。 忐忑中 Stage Start Date Pending Final Recommendation 2012-03-27 Under Editor Review 2012-03-27 Under Editorial Board Review 2012-03-24. Under review에서 Under pending final recommendation 상태로 바뀐후 보통 2일 이내로 E-mail이 올 것입니다. At the bottom of this screen under "Manuscript Tasks" is displayed an "Associate Editor Recommendation" link. Seminars 2018-2019 Program of the 15th CLEA/ECCO/GBI Seminar Series (2018-2019) What? Speakers present their on-going research on various topics within the broad, multidisciplinary domain that we call Evolution, Complexity and Cognition (ECCO), and then get feedback from the audience. On the other hand, if the. 687 (2016) h5-index (2011-2015) = 39. Editorial Review. After the top rated review, the remarks purchasers make about their 39 POUNDS of Cheez Whiz are pretty great. )CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications 1. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. While some argue that highly-esteemed. All species names in this publication were checked for their present taxonomic status (van Soest et al. AE recommendation: After all the reviews are returned, the AE makes the accept or reject recommendation to the EiC based on the returned comments. The IPCC is understood to be a meta-review of the available literature on climate change, but allowing authors to review their own work represents something of a departure from the scientific process. The submission systems of some journals use the status "under review" even when the manuscript is under the initial editorial assessment. detoxhosting. This decision is made by the editors, who determine the editorial policies, guidelines and the appropriate time for publication. When the required number of reviews have been received, the comments and manuscript are forwarded for an editorial review. Background: Obesity is epidemic and leads to substantial morbidity/mortality. More than 2,600 NAS members and Foreign. The IPCC is understood to be a meta-review of the available literature on climate change, but allowing authors to review their own work represents something of a departure from the scientific process. --Aschlafly 15:38, 22 July 2008 (EDT) I tend to agree with you Andy. 2 NAS Member EditorIf the Editorial Board member decides the paper should proceed further, it is assigned to an NAS Member Editor, a professional scientist and active researcher, who oversees the review process and determines suitability of the work for PNAS. Costle Administrator Jeffery D. Forty authors surveyed the law in 20 countries; the focus was on biobanks, but the articles also necessarily covered data sharing. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. Currently, there are more than 210 Editorial Board members.  S01303- Establishes that the council on human blood and transfusion services shall review all current medical research and guidance regarding the donation of blood by patients with a history of Lyme or tick-borne illnesses. Joining together to say that “The GMO Emperor has no clothes” empowers citizens to. Board, created after the global financial crisis to promote high standards of behavior and compe - tence across the banking industry in the United Kingdom and currently comprising 31 member companies. i though i would get rejection letter soon!. Before that, she lent her broad expertise to the flagship American Historical Review as a member of its editorial board from 2014 to 2015. 23 SUPERVISOR RIORDAN: I would so move, Mr. My house was flooded (broken water filter) several weeks ago. Author Summary Cerebral malaria is a severe and often lethal complication from infection with Plasmodium falciparum which is driven in part by pathological host inflammatory response to parasitized red cells′ adherence in the brain microvasculature. PNAS是不是悲剧了? PNAS在editor手里一个多星期了,是不是没戏了? PNAS有戏吗? PNAS 的paper under review了,说明什么? PNAS under review 不到一周就Pending Final Recommendation PNAS "under editorial board review" 要多久?. Second review will be completed within four weeks. EDITORIAL REVIEW. End Times and Current Events in major tsunami after 8. Under Editorial Board Review. They received the revisions the next day and accepted the manuscript, scheduling it for publication on Monday, Nov. detoxhosting. The normal procedure is to submit papers via Track II. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Detoxhosting General Information : Detoxhosting is providing Linux and Reseller website hosting services, has been founded in 2005 and now it's years in business. It continues to have a burden of morbidity and mortality that spans both the consequences of a sometimes progressive biliary injury, alongside a symptom profile notably encompassing pruritus, sicca complex, fatigue, abdominal discomfort and arthralgias/bone pain. The change in status from 'Under review' to 'Pending recommendation' means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go through the reviews and give his/her recommendation on whether it should be accepted, rejected, or revised. NIH Grant Applications. Clicking "Decline to Review" will alert the Journal office that you will not be reviewing the paper, and you will be able to provide a reason for declining. 请问PNAS投稿系统Pending Final Recommendation是否说明已据稿,可以改投他处了,谢谢 Pending Final Recommendation 2013-10-29 Under Editorial Board Review 2013-10-23 Quality Control Review Completed 2013-10-23 Quality Control Review Started 2013-10-23 Author Approved Submission 2013-10-23. Secondly, he has a ghastly point that it is not the science so much that you are criticising as the recommendation (as part of the conclusion). Logging into Editorial Manager. If a patient is referred to another institution for treatment, the primary institution should provide the treatment center with all laboratory results, pathology slides, flow cytometry data, cytogenetic information, and a list of pending tests at the time of the referral. I have submitted several papers to PNAS. My Tweet Stream 2008 > Present eBook or have listened to audiobook pls post a review @Amazon Getting my #bluemind on @SaveOurShores board meeting tonight. Quynh-Thu Le, MD is part of Stanford Profiles, official site for faculty, postdocs, students and staff information (Expertise, Bio, Research, Publications, and more). Aphria does not have some board processes marked in Board Games, such as director performance reviews, but says it is developing a peer review process for the coming year. Surface properties in relation to atelectasis and hyaline membrane disease. This section was formally approved by the CSE Board of Directors on March 30, 2012. Is having money linked to bad behavior? A high profile paper published in 2012 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) set out to answer that question — and found that yes, the more money people have, the more likely they are to lie, cheat, and steal. Peer Review • On submission, all articles are assessed by the Editor-in-Chief. I regret to inform you that the PNAS Editorial Board has rejected your revised manuscript. from Germany in the first place. Congratulations, it worked. Three have been published there, and three others were refereed but rejected. Edited by Diddahally R. By submitting a manuscript to PCD, authors agree to provide access to data that may be needed during the editorial and external peer review process both before and after publication, should questions arise during either time. July 11, 2019 - An article discusses the emerging role of implanted medical devices for improving functional recovery after spinal cord injury, such as research into brain-computer interfaces to augment physical rehabilitation. «PNAS Plus allows authors the option to publish an expanded.  S01303- Establishes that the council on human blood and transfusion services shall review all current medical research and guidance regarding the donation of blood by patients with a history of Lyme or tick-borne illnesses. More than 2,600 NAS members and Foreign. He is currently an editorial board member of the Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions. It went out for. On the other hand, if the. Confused by PNAScentral ms was "under editorial board review"4 2 days, now "pending final recommendation"4 15 days?pic. of Georgia Virginia Armbrust, Univ. It looks like the journal aims to continue to publish review articles of the kind that would meet Wikipedia guidelines for articles on medical topics, an. com what happened after that? I got. Recommendations. TWO CATEGORIES «Published papers can be made immediately available online at no cost to the reader when the authors choose the open access option. Professor Juster is a brilliant scholar, teacher, and administrator who enhances and significantly elevates every project that she touches. every chance they get just to terrorize the public. The effect of "Open Access" (OA) on the visibility or impact of scientific publications is one of the most important issues in the fields of bibliometrics and information science. The Physical Disability Board of Review, or PDBR, was legislated by Congress and implemented by the Department of Defense(1) to ensure the accuracy and fairness of combined disability ratings of 20% or less assigned to service members who were discharged between September 11, 2001 and December 31, 2009. Literature Review. 24 Chairman. Editorial board members complete their reviews online. Is having money linked to bad behavior? A high profile paper published in 2012 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) set out to answer that question — and found that yes, the more money people have, the more likely they are to lie, cheat, and steal. We are committed to publishing all manuscripts receiving the high or top priority recommendation, while those receiving medium priority will be considered for publication on a case-by-case basis. The review process takes around two weeks. of Tokyo Leslie Aiello, Wenner-Gren Foundation Sonia Altizer, Univ. After manuscript submission, authors of papers under consideration for publication will be sent a link to the Authorship Form to complete and submit. PNAS Submission & Editorial Review IT RS. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. Beginning in the 1970s with the use of television in the classroom, to video teleconferencing in the 1980s, to computers in the. I subsequently sold the lot rather than play that game. There are the deadlines imposed by my students when they apply for grants or fellowships or jobs and need highly detailed letters of recommendation, often on. 2015 i Foundational Literature for Moving Native Plant Materials in Changing Climates Mary I. AE recommendation: After all the reviews are returned, the AE makes the accept or reject recommendation to the EiC based on the returned comments. Pending Recommendation 2017-11-09 Under Review 2017-11-08 Under Editor Review 2017-11-08 What was the decision finally? If "Pending Recommendation" comes immediately after "Under Review", then the paper was never sent to the reviewers and it will either be desk rejected, or in some rare cases the editor wants the authors to make some changes before the paper is sent out for review. A few others received editorial desk rejections. Dernière Activité. Recommendations. Pending histological evaluation, all biopsies will be kept at 4°C. provided through a peer-review process that took place in July and August 2014, the documents were substantially revised and issued as information documents for consideration by the twelfth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (UNEP/CBD/COP/12/INF/11 and 12). The second trial will be received for one and a half months, and the third trial will receive the acceptance letter within 25 days. The Editorial Board, PNAS staff, and I continually refine our editorial procedures to improve the journal, and I write to highlight some recent revisions. This research, using a mouse model, shows that following inoculation of mouse-adapted bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) directly into the gut, infectivity subsequently becomes widespread in tissues of the oral cavity, including dental pulp, salivary glands and gingiva, during the preclinical as well as clinical stage of disease. Robillard E, Alarie Y, Dagenais-Perusse P, Baril E, Guilbeault A. Editorial Board, Nano Energy Stanford University, Dept. The IPCC is understood to be a meta-review of the available literature on climate change, but allowing authors to review their own work represents something of a departure from the scientific process. The review(s) must be on the PNAS review form. 第一次投稿PNAS,经过半个多月的Under review,昨天变成了pending recommendation,这代表什么意思呢? 在小木虫看到好多under review之后是pending FINAL recommendation,我的没有final,这样多久能收到审稿意见呢?. The polling question is overly simplistic , because few in the media have bothered to explain the policy details in the pending bills, that: 1) the public option would only be available as a part of a health care "exchange" -- or marketplace -- featuring good-quality, mostly private, insurance plans, and 2) few who now have insurance would have. After 1556 cycles, the thickness dropped signifi-cantly and some, but not all, of the silicon had separated from the current-collector underneath. Stan Cox is a plant breeder and writer in Salina, Kansas. A case was defined as an episode of postoperative infection in a heart transplant receptor, while a control was a patient who did not develop infection after a similar surgery. PNAS Submission & Editorial Review IT RS. Three have been published there, and three others were refereed but rejected. The Role of Morphology in Word Recognition of Hebrew as a Templatic Language. are aware of PNAS policy. It took four weeks for PNAS editorial board to find an editor. Almost seven years after the death of John Pat, and after a number of court proceedings involving the events of the night of 28 September 1983, the Royal Commission came to Roebourne. of Zurich Michael S. The purpose of this review is to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up of laboratory TPAD. Their recent public report outlined that the total after 16 years now stands at $125 million. It looks like the journal aims to continue to publish review articles of the kind that would meet Wikipedia guidelines for articles on medical topics, an. You would not make small changes after submission when submitting by mail, and likewise you should not expect to do so when you submit online. 5 years to a liquidity event. 6 Editorial Board Participation. Check the online status, it is frequently updated. PNAS accepted this data one. If the manuscript passes the editorial review, it is sent to external reviewers for double-blind peer review. Das has co-authored over 35 peer-reviewed publications and several patent disclosures, given dozens of invited talks at several university colloquiums, department seminars, top rated conferences, and workshops. The editorial board of this new journal should be able to draw in a steady stream of good article submissions. Since the status of your paper changed to "under review" half a day after being "with editor," I'm inclined to think that "under review" in this case refers to the initial editorial screening. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. " This statement leaves one with the impression that our utility customers. My house was flooded (broken water filter) several weeks ago. Health media articles: Concise excerpts from highly revealing media articles on health suggest major cover-up. PNAS publishes ‘cutting-edge research’ and papers ‘must be of exceptional scientific importance. This was relatively soon after the NAS panel and House Energy and Commerce Committee hearings in 2006, where I had met Ralph Cicerone, President of NAS. Background: Obesity is epidemic and leads to substantial morbidity/mortality. Scholarship Description The Bob Hawke Postgraduate Scholarship, funded by donations to the University of South Australia’s Bob Hawke Prime Ministerial Centre, honours Prime Minister Bob Hawke’s legacy by supporting excellent PhD research that draws upon the extensive collections of the Centre’s Bob Hawke Prime Ministerial Library. The field of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapeutics has been around since the early 1990s. The Editorial Board screens all incoming submissions and may reject manuscripts without fur-ther review, or review and reject manuscripts that do not meet PNAS standards. The polling question is overly simplistic , because few in the media have bothered to explain the policy details in the pending bills, that: 1) the public option would only be available as a part of a health care "exchange" -- or marketplace -- featuring good-quality, mostly private, insurance plans, and 2) few who now have insurance would have. Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript to PNAS. The life expectancy of a hypothetical 50-year-old American woman today is 81. 26, EST (the time zone of their editorial office). After much resistance from industry (which I will discuss in more detail in the article I am preparing), EPA finally did launch that process, which included convening. Pending test results should be forwarded as they become available. But a major independent review of the bureau's capacity by Clean Energy Regulator Chloe Munro, commissioned after the 2010-11 summer of disaster, found it failed to deliver. The JBBA Editorial Board spans across 23 countries, including nine US States, and is one of the largest networks of Blockchain academics working at some of the most prestigious institutions in the World. It took four weeks for PNAS editorial board to find an editor. ' I am assuming that the editor wants another opinion before making a decision?. 第一次投稿PNAS,经过半个多月的Under review,昨天变成了pending recommendation,这代表什么意思呢? 在小木虫看到好多under review之后是pending FINAL recommendation,我的没有final,这样多久能收到审稿意见呢?. Accept; Accept pending minor revision: no external review required. Thompson and eventually they stopped acknowledging my reminders. Any editorial review board members who continually prove themselves to be effective reviewers and who express a willingness to contribute to the journal beyond their regular reviewer's tasks can be promoted to the role of Associate Editor. PHS XXX Social Disparities, Stress, and Health. The PDRC reviewed information from the two applicants in May and July. Letter to the Editor. detoxhosting. If the editorial decision is accepted pending required revisions, student author has one month to resubmit. By Cara Kennedy-Cuomo, SDG Applied Research Associate, 17 Asset Management and Grace Stone, WIIP Investment Associate and MBA ‘20 As impact investors, asset managers, and high net worth individuals look to turn Impact Investing mainstream, the question of which frameworks to use to define this impact is an exciting but daunting one. The normal procedure is to submit papers via Track II. After months of negotiations with other lawmakers and Bush administration officials, Specter announced a "compromise" agreement last Thursday. At the completion of the review, each reviewer makes one of the following recommendations: Not to Accept, Major Revisions Required, Accept Pending Minor Revisions, or Accept. evaluation by the Editorial Board. Since the review process is three-tier, we were happy that the editorial board and editorial review was completed in two days. However, Editor-in-Chief may request additional review or comments on the revised paper by members of editorial board if it seems necessary. ” AA Says: January 2nd, 2013 at 3:36 AM. It is an illusion. Please be aware that even if you are given the go-ahead to submit your review to Diabetologia, your manuscript will undergo peer review and there can be absolutely no guarantee of eventual acceptance. This would say "Under Review" otherwise. Although research using cell lines and animals is useful, the molecular characteristics, biology, morphology and diseases of animal tissues may be different than equivalent human tissues (e. In patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation who are in s. Being pending means that the provider has received the signed identity of a new user and has provided the user with a (maybe temporary) access token, but has not yet granted. of Georgia Virginia Armbrust, Univ. It is the second largest family in the CFR flora after Asteraceae. 2 NAS Member EditorIf the Editorial Board member decides the paper should proceed further, it is assigned to an NAS Member Editor, a professional scientist and active researcher, who oversees the review process and determines suitability of the work for PNAS. I say we get this thing sent to PNAS and see what happens. Under Editor Review 2016-07-12 Under Editorial Board Review 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Completed 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Started 2016-06-24 Author Approved Submission 2016-06-24 Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted Could somebody tell me what "pending for final recommendation" after "under review" on same day? Thanks. After careful consideration, the editor decided that we cannot accept your manuscript. But my personal experience has been that it doesn't seem to matter--i've had rapid RRs, and rejects that pend for weeks. After years of slowly tightening its editorial policy, papers contributed by National Academy of Science (NAS) members appear to be performing more like other submissions. Manuscript selection. After logging into the system and clicking on a "Draft Recommendation" manuscript link preceded by a red arrow, you are presented with a Manuscript Items/Tasks screen as described above. In many journals the decision does not fall solely on the editor, but papers are discussed to some extent by the editorial board. This was the case, for example, of the PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) until July 2010; the top of an article looked like this: Some journals use this formulation to denote the handling editor: the one who makes the editorial decision (or recommendation to the full editorial board), after having selected referees and. SENIOR EDITORIAL BOARD A. Hospital Zürich Takuzo Aida, Univ. The paper is first screened by a Board member who will decide whether the paper is likely to be in the top 10% of its field and is sound. Because this disease predominantly affects MNs, we aimed to characterize the distinct expression profile. As C might also verify further users, it is possible for longer pending chains to come into existence. The Research Integrity Adjudications Panel concluded that the preponderance of the evidence in the record supported the following charges made against Kimon J. 687 (2016) h5-index (2011-2015) = 39. «PNAS Plus allows authors the option to publish an expanded. このステータスは、すべての査読が終了し、編集事務局に届いているという意味です。時には、査読結果を検討し、追加の査読が必要だとエディターが感じるかもしれません。そういう場合は、ステータスが“Under Review”にもどることもあります。. I just submitted my first, first-author paper to PNAS this week and was wondering what it means for the review status to change from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation. Criticism of Facebook stems from the company's prominence and has led to international media coverage and significant reporting of its legal troubles and the outsize influence it has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well on its influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed. I re-submitted a couple times after that but to no avail and still with no feedback. Kachelmeier The University of Texas at Austin, The Accounting Review, November 2009, Page 2056. Editorial Board Joseph G Akar. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. This applied evidence-based review provides a rationale for the diagnosis and treatment of obesity in adults by providing test characteristics for the body mass index (BMI) and number needed to treat (NNT) for relevant treatments. There were many advances in areas of basic cardiac electrophysiology ranging from application of genetic tools to better understanding electrophysiological disease to identifying potentially targetable molecular and protein mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis to characterizing the noncardiac milieu that drives evolution of substrate in a variety of different. When Cozzarelli started as Editor-in-Chief, 26 people sat on the PNAS Editorial Board, most of whom worked in the biological sciences. Second review will be completed within four weeks. RMRS-GTR-347. When submitted, the review itself should include a paragraph listing authors' duality of interest and any agency involvement. Under Editor Review: 2014-06-16 Your paper may be sent for review, or maybe not. Basic Cardiac Electrophysiology. After careful consideration, the editor decided that we cannot accept your manuscript. After years of slowly tightening its editorial policy, papers contributed by National Academy of Science (NAS) members appear to be performing more like other submissions. The editor-in-chief or principal editor should define the terms and roles of the editors and editorial board that are appointed by and report to him or her. In 1995, PNAS began accepting Direct Submissions from researchers without an NAS affiliation. And regardless, best of luck with your paper! (p. PNAS Submission & Editorial Review IT RS. I subsequently sold the lot rather than play that game. How to interpret Decision Letters? Once the peer review and editorial process is completed, the author will receive one of the following notifications. このステータスは、すべての査読が終了し、編集事務局に届いているという意味です。時には、査読結果を検討し、追加の査読が必要だとエディターが感じるかもしれません。そういう場合は、ステータスが“Under Review”にもどることもあります。. Suggested reviewers will be considered and used at the editor's discretion. Clicking "Decline to Review" will alert the Journal office that you will not be reviewing the paper, and you will be able to provide a reason for declining. Board, created after the global financial crisis to promote high standards of behavior and compe - tence across the banking industry in the United Kingdom and currently comprising 31 member companies. An excellent review of the current organizational structure of stroke rehabilitation care in the United States can be found in Table 1. As of Oct 10, we're $12,800 in the red for the year. One of them gave very general comments and didn`t seem to be critical about the work. TWO CATEGORIES «Published papers can be made immediately available online at no cost to the reader when the authors choose the open access option. Editor Board Member 是本领域的美国科学院院士,大牛。据我的有限了解,投到PNAS的文章修改后一般都会送二审吧。 忐忑中 Stage Start Date Pending Final Recommendation 2012-03-27 Under Editor Review 2012-03-27 Under Editorial Board Review 2012-03-24. It is the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences , published since 1915, and publishes original research, scientific reviews, commentaries, and letters. I regret to inform you that the PNAS Editorial Board has rejected your revised manuscript. For more information, please visit www. ERIC Educational Resources Information Center. Extracts can, if preferred, be read in chronological order by using the "Up" link to go to the start of the item next above the one just read. And the greedier they. All Tracks. Scholarship Description The Bob Hawke Postgraduate Scholarship, funded by donations to the University of South Australia’s Bob Hawke Prime Ministerial Centre, honours Prime Minister Bob Hawke’s legacy by supporting excellent PhD research that draws upon the extensive collections of the Centre’s Bob Hawke Prime Ministerial Library. It means review are in, and either (if it is a single editor) he or (if it is a board of editors) they are reviewing the reviews, weighing the merits of the argument and determining what to do. Now this might be a good plan, (or not) however, in 2001 the Labour Government stopped the logging of native timber on the West Coast. The Editorial Board; City council ordinance proposing ban of e-cigarettes sales in LA pending review. They are as- sisted by subject-matter experts from the School's Academic Department. All papers published in PNAS are subject to peer review by referees, and final approval from a member of the Editorial Board is required. After considering the risks assessments, available information about alternatives to creosote, public comments, and risk mitigation options, the Agency developed its reregi strati on eligibility and risk management decision for wood preservative uses of creosote. Williams Project Officer January, 1981 Effluent Guidelines Division Office of Water and Waste Management U.